We Need to Democratize Science

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts."

Richard Feynman

I can give you absolute proof that the top graph in the two graphs below is fraudulent, and the bottom graph is factual. And I don't even have to read Mann's hockey stick paper to do it. Real science means we don't trust the experts; we trust the people that say the experts are frauds. The battle is over and Ball has won!

If the last 28 years since Michael Mann published his hockey stick has taught us anything, it's that we cannot "trust the science" anymore. We can be absolutely certain of the fact that all climate science is a fraud because Mann hid all the data that Tim Ball needed to prove it to be a fraud. And then other "scientists" kept writing papers that agree with Mann's fraudulent hockey stick. If Mann's hockey stick was so right, why write so many papers with other hockey sticks? Obviously, the only reason why is that Tim Ball was correct all along.

There are dozens of new papers about hockey sticks written by even more scientists, and all of them are "experts." I can't find any papers that don't conform to Mann's fraudulent graph. So obviously the science is corrupt. But then I was reminded of Feyman's famous quote that "science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." Feynman is a science expert, and he says we should believe that science experts are ignorant, and so it must be that the science experts need people like Tim Ball to correct them and expose their fraud.

I think we need to democratize science so that the "scientists" have no more say than anyone else. Why  should we trust Michael Mann over Tim Ball? Tim Ball was never convicted of fraud, so of course his graph on the bottom must be right after all. We need to make sure that everyone with an opinion and a graph is taken more seriously than the "experts" with all their data and evidence and peer review and technical jargon that nobody understands anyway. And with that I was able to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Tim Ball's graph was correct without even reading Michael Mann's paper. 

Why should we bother reading papers we already know are wrong? Why follow the science we already know is corrupt? Why should trust the experts that Feynman says are ignorant? It's so much easier to get our climate beliefs from blogs, substacks, YouTube videos and shorts, and social media posts.

And if we choose to believe the non-experts who have not been brainwashed by the science and evidence of the climate doomer cult, we will feel so much better about ourselves. One of my heroes is Lucy Biggers. When she was a climate activist, she felt so much anxiety about climate doomerism. But then she read some books by non-scientists and found out that if she just believes what they say, she won't have to feel any anxiety about the climate anymore. 

And trusting the science just leads to the ruin of western civilization! I mean, just look at what they want. I made a list:

1. They want to end fossil fuels. 
2. They want to raise our taxes. 
3. They want to make us stop eating meat and force us to eat bugs. 
4. They want to lock us up in 15-minute cities. 
5. They want to keep us from having children. 
6. They want to seize all private ownership.
7. They want to control our lives. 

I know this because the non-experts we can trust have made so many YouTube videos about the alarmist agenda, and this is so terrifying I can hardly stand it. Whenever I tell my children about what these alarmists want to do to civilization, they get so scared they have a hard time sleeping at night. I mean, their favorite park is 20 minutes away, and they won't be able to go to it anymore if we get locked up in a 15-minute city. It's so terrifying! Almost the entire world is trying ruin the world! I'm so glad I'm not an alarmist so that I can be happy and anxiety free.